Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Administrator Disclosed Resident's Code Status in Public, Violating Privacy Policy

Unionville, Missouri Survey Completed on 08-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of a resident's personal and medical records when the Administrator disclosed the resident's change in code status from full code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) to a family member who was not the resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA), and did so in a public setting. The disclosure occurred while the Administrator was at a golf course, where the resident's family member and another unrelated individual were present. The Administrator informed the family member of the resident's change in code status, which led to a misunderstanding that the resident had experienced a code event. The family member subsequently shared this information with others and went to the facility, only to find the resident awake and confused. The resident's DPOA later stated that they did not want the resident's medical information shared with anyone else, emphasizing that the Administrator should not have disclosed the change in code status to other family members or in a public place. The Administrator acknowledged that she should not have shared the resident's personal medical information with anyone other than the DPOA, recognizing that this action violated both the resident's privacy and the facility's privacy policy. The facility's policy and federal law require that all resident information be kept confidential and only disclosed in accordance with privacy regulations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙