Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Incorporate PASARR Level II Recommendations into Care Plan

Saint Louis, Missouri Survey Completed on 08-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that recommendations from a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were incorporated into the care plan for a resident with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, learning disorder, and paraplegia. The PASARR Level II Summary of Findings specified that the resident required supports and services such as medication therapy, crisis intervention services, discharge planning, structured development, and a personal support network. However, review of the resident's care plan at the time of survey showed that these recommendations were not addressed. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibility for following up on PASARR recommendations. The Social Worker Assistant, Social Services Director, Admission Coordinator, and MDS Rehab nurse each described different understandings of their roles in the PASARR process, with none taking responsibility for ensuring the recommendations were incorporated into the care plan. The DON confirmed that the care plan should reflect the PASARR Level II recommendations, but this was not done for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙