Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Complete Incontinent Care and Timely Checks

Sikeston, Missouri Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to two residents who were incontinent of bladder, resulting in both being left in urine-saturated briefs with a strong urine odor. Observations revealed that during incontinent care, staff did not adequately clean the residents' pelvic and groin areas, only washing the buttocks and backs of the legs before applying a clean brief. This incomplete hygiene practice was observed for both residents, despite their care plans indicating a need for extensive assistance with activities of daily living, including toileting and hygiene. Resident #4 had a history of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and vascular dementia, with moderate cognitive impairment and dependence for toileting hygiene. Resident #5 had diagnoses including Parkinsonism, ataxia, spinal stenosis, and hemiplegia, also with moderate cognitive impairment and dependence for toileting hygiene. Both residents were observed to be left in urine-saturated briefs prior to care, and the care provided did not include cleaning of the front and peri areas as required. Interviews with residents indicated delays in being checked or changed, with some residents reporting being left wet for extended periods and staff not returning after call lights were activated. Staff interviews confirmed that all soiled areas should be cleaned during incontinent care, and the DON stated that residents should be checked every two hours if incontinent. However, the facility lacked a specific policy on the timing of incontinence checks, and the observed care did not meet the expected standards for thorough cleaning.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙