Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Use Safe Transfer Methods and Care Plan Resident Preferences

Mountain Grove, Missouri Survey Completed on 04-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a manner that prevented possible injury and did not include the resident's specific transfer needs or preferences in the care plan. The resident, who had a history of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, tricuspid valve insufficiency, depression, and a previous hip fracture, required substantial assistance with transfers and was at risk for falls, pain, and impaired skin integrity. The care plan did not specify the method of transfer, the number of staff required, or address the resident's preferences or refusals related to transfer assistance. Interviews and record reviews revealed that staff were trained to use gait belts for resident transfers, as outlined in facility policy. However, staff reported that the resident often refused the use of a gait belt, stating it was uncomfortable. Instead, staff used an unsafe 'hug' technique, where the resident placed their arms around the staff's neck and the staff lifted the resident under the arms. Multiple staff, including CNAs, LPNs, RNs, and nursing leadership, acknowledged that this method was not appropriate and did not align with facility policy or safe transfer practices. Despite the resident's refusal to use a gait belt, there was no documentation in the care plan regarding the resident's transfer preferences or refusals, nor was there an alternative safe transfer method identified. Staff continued to use the unsafe technique, and leadership confirmed that the resident required a gait belt for all transfers due to weakness. The lack of individualized care planning and failure to follow safe transfer procedures resulted in the area not being free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙