Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Schedule Urology Follow-Up for Resident with Indwelling Catheter

Saint Louis, Missouri Survey Completed on 06-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident with recurrent urinary tract infections and severe urethra erosion from prolonged use of an indwelling urinary catheter received care consistent with professional standards. Despite multiple physician and hospital orders for regular urology follow-up and catheter exchanges, staff did not schedule the required follow-up appointments with the urologist. The resident's care plan inaccurately documented the presence of a suprapubic catheter, which was not supported by the medical record, and there was no evidence that the necessary urology appointments were made after hospital discharges or as directed by the physician. Record reviews showed that the resident had a history of obstructive and reflux uropathy, bladder-neck obstruction, cognitive impairment, and required maximum assistance for all activities of daily living. Orders included regular catheter care and exchanges, and hospital discharge summaries repeatedly indicated the need for urology follow-up. However, documentation of these follow-up appointments was missing, and interviews with staff and administration revealed a lack of awareness regarding the missed appointments and the resident's ongoing urethra erosion. Interviews with nursing and administrative staff confirmed that the responsibility for scheduling follow-up appointments and transcribing orders fell to the charge nurse upon the resident's return from hospital or physician visits. Despite these expectations, the required follow-up appointments were not made until prompted by the surveyor's investigation, and the oversight was not identified by supervisory staff. The resident experienced ongoing issues with catheter clogging, leakage, and skin breakdown, further highlighting the lack of adherence to professional standards of care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙