Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
D

Facility Assessment Lacked Comprehensive Staffing and Resource Evaluation

Greenville, Mississippi Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to update its Facility Assessment to include a comprehensive evaluation of the resident population and the necessary resources, such as staffing levels and competencies, required to meet resident needs during both routine operations and emergencies. Review of the facility's policy indicated that the assessment should be conducted annually and used to inform staffing decisions for all shifts, including nights and weekends, and should be adjusted based on changes in the resident population. However, the Facility Assessment document only marked sufficiency analysis categories as 'Evaluated' without documenting specific staffing levels for each shift or addressing the specific skills and competencies needed for the current resident population. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed that the assessment process involved marking staffing as 'evaluated' or 'sufficient' without actually calculating or addressing the staffing and skills required for specific shifts, including night shifts, weekends, and emergencies. This lack of detailed documentation and analysis was observed over three survey days, and the deficiency was identified through interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews. No specific residents or their medical conditions were mentioned in relation to this deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙