Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
D

Failure to Assess and Provide Adequate Staffing and Equipment

Jackson, Mississippi Survey Completed on 06-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to competently care for residents during both routine operations and emergencies. The facility's assessment did not include information regarding the number of staff required or the number of mechanical lifts needed to meet the needs of the resident population. Policy review indicated that the facility was required to assess equipment, supplies, and personnel annually, but the actual assessment lacked these critical details. The staffing policy also referenced the facility assessment as a basis for determining sufficient staffing, but this was not reflected in practice. Interviews with the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) revealed that staffing was scheduled based on per patient day (PPD) calculations without consideration of resident acuity or specific care needs on different units. The SDC was unaware of the facility assessment's role in staffing decisions. Observations and interviews with the DON and Administrator confirmed that only one full-body lift and one sit-to-stand lift were available, and that if a lift was in use on one unit, residents on the other unit experienced delays in care. The Administrator acknowledged that the facility assessment did not address the number of lifts or staffing levels needed to provide timely care, affecting all residents, including those with higher dependency and diagnoses such as morbid obesity.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙