Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0635
D

Failure to Schedule and Complete Urology Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge

Wheaton, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a hospital physician's discharge order for a follow-up appointment with urology was scheduled and completed for a resident who was readmitted from the hospital. Upon re-entry, the resident had a history of severely impaired cognition, impaired mobility, neurogenic bladder, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and was dependent on an indwelling urinary catheter. Hospital discharge instructions specifically directed that the Foley catheter was to remain in place until a follow-up with urology, and that the catheter should be changed every four weeks. However, review of the resident's medical records did not identify that a urology appointment was scheduled or completed as ordered. Progress notes and interviews revealed ongoing complications with the resident's urinary catheter, including episodes of no urine output, unsuccessful irrigation, bleeding at the catheter insertion site, and eventual trauma during catheter removal that resulted in an emergency room visit and hospital admission for catheter complications and UTI. The hospital discharge summary after this event noted a fissure caused by the catheter and provided specific instructions for catheter care, including a referral to urology for possible supra-pubic catheter placement. Despite these ongoing issues, staff interviews confirmed that the resident had not been scheduled for a urology appointment after the initial hospital discharge, and the last known urology visit was several years prior. Multiple staff members, including the assistant director of nursing and the director of nursing, acknowledged that the follow-up with urology was not completed and that the facility did not ensure the appointment was scheduled as ordered. Family members also expressed concern and were unaware of any urology follow-up. The deficiency was attributed to a lack of follow-through on discharge orders and inadequate documentation and communication regarding specialist appointments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙