Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Lack of Clinical Rationale for Continued PRN Lorazepam Use

Warren, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a clinician documented a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication, specifically Lorazepam, for a resident with diagnoses including depression, psychotic disorder with delusions, pain, weakness, anxiety, and Alzheimer's disease. Multiple verbal orders for Lorazepam 0.5 mg every eight hours as needed for anxiety were confirmed and renewed over several months, but none of the orders included a documented clinical rationale for the ongoing use of the PRN medication. Additionally, a facility form regarding psychotropic medication gradual dose reduction attempts indicated that a dose reduction was not possible, but the required section for clinical rationale was left blank and only signed by the physician. During an interview, the DON acknowledged that the facility had implemented a process for providers to write new orders for PRN medications that were expiring but was unaware that a clinical rationale was required for the continued use of PRN psychotropic medications. Facility policy stated that PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days required practitioner documentation of the rationale for the extended order, which was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙