Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Implement Timely Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Assessment

Mountain Lake, Minnesota Survey Completed on 07-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to assess, monitor, and implement pressure-relieving interventions for a resident who developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx area. The resident was admitted with a history of stroke, impaired mobility, and skin fragility, but was initially assessed as being at low to moderate risk for pressure ulcers, with no pressure injuries present on admission. Despite the presence of risk factors such as immobility, poor nutritional intake, and incontinence, the care plan did not include comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention measures until after a red area was discovered on the coccyx. When a red area was first noted on the resident's coccyx, there was a delay in both assessment and the implementation of preventative interventions. Documentation and interviews revealed that no interventions to prevent further skin breakdown were put in place between the initial discovery of the red area and the subsequent assessment, during which the wound had already opened. The facility's own policy required immediate preventative measures and individualized repositioning plans for residents unable to reposition themselves, but these were not initiated in a timely manner. Additionally, there was a lack of consistent wound assessment and documentation, with significant gaps between assessments and no evidence of a repositioning assessment being completed. As the resident's condition deteriorated, the pressure ulcer progressed to an unstageable wound with necrotic tissue and infection, ultimately requiring hospitalization for cellulitis and advanced wound care. Interviews with staff and providers confirmed that preventative measures were not implemented promptly after the initial signs of skin breakdown, and that the severity of the wound could have been mitigated with earlier intervention. The facility's failure to follow its own protocols for pressure ulcer prevention and timely intervention directly contributed to the development and worsening of the resident's pressure ulcer.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙