Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0773
D

Failure to Notify Practitioner of Abnormal Lab Result

Hopkins, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when facility staff failed to promptly notify the ordering practitioner of an abnormal laboratory result for a resident who was tested for influenza A, RSV, and COVID-19 following an acute visit for a new problem. The laboratory swab was collected and resulted in a positive influenza A finding, which was marked as abnormal. However, the nurse manager documented in a late entry note that the lab results were negative and later admitted to being unaware of the positive result. The only evidence of the positive result was a scanned copy of the faxed lab report, and there was no documentation confirming that the nurse manager had notified the nurse practitioner of the abnormal finding. Interviews with the DON and the nurse practitioner confirmed that neither was aware of the positive influenza A result until informed by surveyors. The DON stated that she expected the provider to have been notified, and the nurse practitioner indicated she would have treated the resident for influenza A had she been informed. The facility's policies required timely notification of abnormal lab results to the attending physician or designee, but this was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙