Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Promote Dignified Dining Experience for Residents Requiring Assistance

Two Harbors, Minnesota Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience for six residents with severe cognitive impairments who required assistance with eating. Observations revealed that staff, including nursing assistants and an LPN, assisted these residents with meals while standing over them, rather than sitting at their level, and sometimes while performing other tasks. Residents who required feeding assistance were served their meals earlier than other residents and in a separate dinette area, rather than being given the option to eat in the main dining room with others. Staff interviews confirmed that this practice was implemented to make it easier for staff to manage meal service, rather than based on resident preference or choice. The affected residents had significant medical histories, including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, traumatic brain injury, and other cognitive or physical impairments, and their care plans directed staff to provide meal set-up and assistance as needed. Despite these directives, the facility's approach did not encourage resident choice or dignity, as most of the residents receiving early trays were unable to choose whether they would have preferred to eat in the main dining room. Facility policy required that residents be encouraged to eat in the dining room and be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity, including not standing over residents while assisting with meals and avoiding the use of labels such as "feeders."

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙