Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Code MDS for Resident Safety Alarms

Fergus Falls, Minnesota Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded to reflect the use of safety alarms for a resident with medically complex conditions, including hypertension, anxiety, and depression, who required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Despite the resident's care plan and physician orders indicating the use of bed, recliner, and wheelchair alarms as fall interventions, the MDS assessment did not document the presence of these alarms. Multiple observations confirmed the resident was consistently using bed and chair alarms, and staff interviews verified that these alarms had been in place for an extended period. The MDS coordinator acknowledged that the alarms were not coded on the MDS and stated that the standard process involved reviewing assessments, care plans, and care conference notes, but a visual assessment was not performed for this resident at the time of the MDS completion. Both the MDS coordinator and nursing staff confirmed that the alarms should have been included in the MDS coding. The facility's policy required that MDS assessments consistently reflect information from progress notes, care plans, and resident observations, which was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙