Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Alarm System Testing

Belgrade, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with severe cognitive impairment, anxiety, unsteadiness, and a history of falls was admitted to the facility and later identified as being at risk for wandering due to confusion and impaired safety awareness. The resident's care plan included the use of a wander alert device, which was to be checked each shift and tested nightly. Despite these measures, the resident was able to exit the facility on multiple occasions without staff knowledge, remaining on campus but unsupervised. On one occasion, the resident was observed outside by a staff member, and it was discovered that the wander alert device did not trigger an alarm when the resident exited, although it functioned when the resident returned inside. Interviews with staff revealed that while the wander alert devices worn by residents were checked for functionality, the alarm boxes at the facility doors were not routinely tested to ensure they would sound when a resident with a device approached or exited. Staff also reported that alarms were not always audible from resident rooms, and some staff only became aware of the resident's exit after being informed by others. Documentation showed that the wander alert device was replaced after the incident, but subsequent testing of the original device indicated it was still operational, and the reason for the malfunction during the incident could not be determined. The facility's policy required daily testing and documentation of the wander management alarms, but the investigation found that only the wearable devices were checked, not the door alarm boxes. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide the operation manual for the wander alert system when requested. The lack of comprehensive testing and supervision allowed the resident to leave the building undetected, constituting a failure to provide adequate supervision and maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙