Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Failure to Ensure Communication and Implementation of Dialysis Orders

Litchfield, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with dialysis services for a resident with renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and depression who required dialysis. The resident's care plan lacked specific instructions regarding the management of hypotension, the need for blood pressure monitoring, and contained conflicting information about fluid restrictions. Hospital discharge orders indicated no fluid restriction was needed, but facility physician orders and the care plan included a fluid restriction and a high sodium diet, creating inconsistency in care directives. Additionally, the care plan did not detail how communication with the dialysis center should occur, what information should be shared, or who was responsible for follow-up. Medical records showed that after the dialysis center communicated the need for twice daily blood pressure checks due to the resident's low blood pressure and high ostomy output, the facility failed to consistently implement this order. Blood pressure readings were not documented as required, and there was no evidence that medication orders to increase phosphorus supplementation or to adjust fluid intake were implemented as communicated by the dialysis provider. The resident continued to arrive at dialysis with low blood pressure, and the dialysis center reported difficulty reaching facility staff to relay urgent orders. Interviews revealed that the nurse manager was absent when a critical voicemail was left by the dialysis center regarding new medication orders, and there was no process in place to ensure voicemails were checked in her absence. As a result, the resident did not receive the necessary medications or blood pressure monitoring prior to dialysis, leading to a situation where the resident was sent to dialysis with undetected hypotension and ultimately required transfer to the emergency department. The facility's own hemodialysis policy required ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis team, which was not maintained in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙