Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Properly Investigate and Protect Residents After Abuse Allegation

Litchfield, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate and protect residents following an anonymous external email alleging abuse and neglect by staff. The allegations included neglect, improper wound care, unqualified staff performing medical procedures, and direct abuse by specific staff members toward three residents with varying cognitive statuses. The facility's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, as well as audits of wounds, showers, insulin administration, and catheter placements, all completed within a two-hour timeframe. The investigation concluded that the allegations were unsubstantiated, with residents denying the reported events and no discrepancies found in the audits. However, the investigation did not include interviews with all employees named in the abuse complaint, nor did it document the removal or suspension of any staff during the investigation or the implementation of protections for residents. Additionally, the investigation was not conducted by a partial or non-biased party, as required by facility policy when administration is named in the allegation. The administrator, who was named in the complaint, oversaw the investigation and conducted staff interviews, despite policy requiring a separate party to investigate in such circumstances.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙