Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0580
D

Failure to Notify Provider of Significant Change in Condition for Dialysis Resident

Litchfield, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely notification to a provider regarding a significant change in condition for a resident who was receiving dialysis and had a history of hypotension. The resident's care plan directed staff to keep the medical doctor informed of changes, and physician orders required vital signs to be taken after dialysis on specific days. Blood pressure records showed multiple low readings, including a notably low value of 76/43, but there was no evidence that the physician or nurse practitioner was notified of this critical change. The nurse manager was unaware of the low reading and could not confirm if the provider had been informed. Further, the nurse practitioner confirmed that neither she nor the physician had been notified of the resident's low blood pressure, which she considered concerning and would have warranted immediate action. The nurse practitioner was also unaware that the resident had been sent to the emergency department from dialysis with an even lower blood pressure and was subsequently admitted to the intensive care unit. Facility policy required that changes in a resident's condition be reported to the attending physician, but this protocol was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙