Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0676
D

Failure to Provide Consistent ASL Interpreter Access for Deaf Resident

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to consistently provide appropriate communication support for a resident who was deaf and used American Sign Language (ASL) as their primary language. The resident's care plan and provider orders specified the need for an ASL interpreter, especially for significant interactions such as care conferences, assessments, and daily care activities. Despite these documented needs and preferences, staff interviews and resident statements revealed that the ASL interpreter, accessible via an iPad, was not regularly used. Instead, staff often relied on written communication, which the resident found confusing and inadequate, particularly when staff were non-English speaking or unfamiliar with ASL structure. The resident repeatedly expressed a preference for the ASL interpreter to be used for all care interactions, but this was not consistently honored. Multiple staff members, including nursing assistants, a trained medical aid, and a registered nurse, confirmed that they did not use the iPad interpreter during their interactions with the resident, often defaulting to written notes or yes/no questions. The social worker was identified as the only staff member who regularly used the iPad interpreter. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the care plan required use of the ASL interpreter for major interactions and agreed that staff should follow the resident's stated preference. Facility policy also required interpreter use upon resident request and for key care communications, but this was not consistently implemented, resulting in a failure to meet the resident's communication needs as outlined in their care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙