Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident Discharge Status

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded to reflect the actual discharge status of a resident. Specifically, the MDS for one resident indicated a discharge to a short-term general hospital, while both the resident's progress notes and nursing progress notes documented that the resident was discharged home to an assisted living facility and had signed onto hospice care. This discrepancy was identified during an interview and document review, where the MDS coordinator confirmed the MDS was inaccurately coded and did not match the resident's actual discharge destination. The director of nursing also acknowledged that the MDS was expected to be accurate and that MDS coordinators are required to follow the MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. The manual specifies that accurate assessments must be based on information from multiple sources, including the resident's medical record and direct care staff, and must reflect the resident's actual status during the observation period. In this case, the failure to accurately code the MDS assessment was confirmed by both the MDS coordinator and the director of nursing.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙