Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
F

Failure to Accurately Track and Document Employee Illnesses for Return to Work

Excelsior, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that employee illnesses were properly tracked and documented to determine when staff could safely return to work, as required by their infection prevention and control program. Review of employee absence and illness logs from February through June 2025 revealed incomplete documentation for three sampled staff members, including missing information on symptom resolution, test results, and clearance for return to work. For example, a housekeeping aide returned to work after reporting a fever, but there was no documentation of symptom resolution. Similarly, a speech therapist returned after a sore throat and COVID testing, but the log lacked evidence of test results. A certified nursing assistant returned to work after experiencing diarrhea, but there was no documentation of symptom resolution or whether the illness was potentially norovirus. Interviews with the administrator confirmed that employees were expected to report symptoms to the DON, who would then review their health status for clearance to return to work. However, the administrator was not aware of the specific illness or treatment for the certified nursing assistant, and the illness logs did not consistently reflect accurate tracking or clearance procedures. Policy review indicated that staff were required to report certain infections to the infection preventionist and to seek evaluation if symptoms persisted or worsened, but these procedures were not consistently followed or documented.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙