Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0809
F

Failure to Routinely Offer Snacks Between Meals

Excelsior, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to routinely offer snacks to residents when the interval between meals exceeded 14 hours, affecting all 35 residents. One resident, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, and COPD, reported never being offered a snack during her stay and was unaware she could request one. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices regarding snack distribution, with some staff noting that snacks were only available if specifically requested from the kitchen and that there was no regular snack cart or routine offering. The dietary manager confirmed that snacks were not consistently provided and was unsure of the established process, while the registered dietitian acknowledged that residents would benefit from snacks and fluids at least once daily but was unfamiliar with the facility's procedures. The administrator agreed that there was a significant gap in the process, noting that there were 15 hours between supper and breakfast without a substantial snack being offered. Review of the facility's snack policy showed that while it described how to assist residents with snacks, it did not specify the timing or frequency for offering them. This lack of routine snack provision and unclear policy contributed to the deficiency identified during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙