Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Update POLST to Reflect Resident's Current Wishes and Treatment

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 07-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a Provider Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was updated to accurately reflect the current wishes of a resident with severely impaired cognition, quadriplegia, and chronic respiratory failure. The resident had a tracheostomy and required mechanical ventilation, yet the POLST form indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) with selective treatment, specifying no intubation, advanced airway, or mechanical ventilation. This conflicted with the resident's actual care needs, as the resident was dependent on mechanical ventilation following a recent hospitalization. The provider order and POLST were not aligned with the resident's current treatment, and the POLST had not been updated after significant changes in the resident's condition. Interviews with nursing staff revealed uncertainty about the frequency of POLST reviews after admission, and it was confirmed that while care conferences discussed the POLST, the actual form was not reviewed for accuracy. The Director of Nursing stated that POLST forms should be reviewed upon admission and after hospitalizations, but this was not consistently done. Facility policy required routine audits of POLST documentation, but this was not followed, resulting in a discrepancy between the resident's documented wishes and the care provided.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙