Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Assess, Monitor, and Respond to Resident Incidents

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-23-2025

Penalty

65 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with severe cognitive impairment, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, and ventilator dependence was not properly assessed or monitored for several significant events. The facility failed to document or investigate a bruise observed on the resident's right upper arm, despite the bruise being pointed out by a family member and the resident making a statement suggesting possible abuse. There was no documentation in the progress notes or weekly skin assessments regarding the bruise, nor evidence of staff-to-resident abuse allegations being investigated, as required by facility policy. Additionally, the resident ingested a wound cleanser spray, an event witnessed by a psychologist and later reported by a family member. There was no documentation that the physician or poison control was notified, nor any evidence of monitoring or follow-up after the ingestion, despite the product label instructing to seek medical attention if swallowed. Interviews with facility staff, including the nurse practitioner, psychologist, and ADON, confirmed a lack of awareness or documentation regarding the ingestion incident. The facility also failed to respond to repeated pulse oximeter alarms while the resident was on a ventilator. Video footage showed the alarm sounding multiple times over several minutes without staff response, and the ADON confirmed that staff should have checked on the resident. The facility was unable to provide policies or procedures related to chemical ingestion or pulse oximeter alarm response, and the DON acknowledged that documentation and follow-up were lacking in these incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙