Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0697
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Pain Management and Non-Pharmacological Interventions

Crystal, Minnesota Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate pain management for a resident with a history of significant injuries and ongoing pain. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including injuries from a motor vehicle accident, intervertebral disc degeneration, and chronic back pain, did not have a pain assessment documented in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The electronic medical record (EMR) included orders for pain medications and required pain monitoring every shift, but there was no evidence that pain monitoring was consistently documented. Additionally, the EMR lacked documentation of non-pharmacological pain interventions being offered or their effectiveness, and the pain assessment form left the section for non-medication interventions blank. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident experienced visible and severe pain, reported that prescribed medications were not effective, and stated that staff did not respond adequately to her pain complaints. Staff interviews confirmed that pain levels were not routinely assessed and that non-pharmacological interventions were not being used. The facility's policy indicated that non-pharmacological interventions should be considered, but these were not implemented for the resident in question. The care plan included some interventions, such as positioning with pillows and administering pain medication, but did not address the lack of consistent pain monitoring or the use of alternative pain relief methods.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙