Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Address Significant Weight Gain and Nutritional Status

Crystal, Minnesota Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to recognize and respond to a significant weight gain in a resident, resulting in a lack of interventions to maintain acceptable nutritional status. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, asthma, and diabetes, was admitted at 165 pounds and later recorded at 231 pounds, reflecting a 35.8% increase in weight. Despite an order for a diabetic, regular textured diet, the resident's electronic medical record showed no follow-up or intervention from dietary or nutrition services regarding the substantial weight gain. The most recent nutrition data noted the weight increase but did not include any interventions, only indicating that the registered dietician would follow up as needed. Interviews revealed that the resident expressed concerns about the quality and appropriateness of the food provided, stating it was not suitable for a diabetic diet and that no dietician had addressed her weight gain or dietary concerns. The dietary manager acknowledged awareness of the resident's complaints but had not discussed the weight gain with the resident, citing the resident's right to choose their food. A licensed practical nurse confirmed the significant weight gain and noted that the dietician typically monitored nutritional status but had not followed up in this case. Facility policy required evaluation and intervention for undesirable weight changes, but this process was not followed for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙