Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Arrange and Prepare for Safe Discharge

Crystal, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with significant medical needs, including a recent surgical amputation, immunodeficiency, diabetes, and open wounds requiring complex wound care, was discharged from the facility without a comprehensive discharge plan or proper arrangements for home care services. The resident's care plan did not include any discharge focus, goals, or interventions, and the Minimum Data Set lacked a cognitive assessment. Although the provider ordered skilled nursing and occupational therapy for the home, there was no evidence that these services were arranged prior to discharge. The facility's social worker, who was responsible for setting up home care services, was not present at the time of discharge and did not begin searching for agencies until after the resident had already left. Multiple home care agencies were contacted after the discharge, but all denied services. The resident was not contacted by the facility following discharge, and there was a lack of communication regarding which agency would provide the necessary care. Nursing staff assumed that home care services were in place, but there was no confirmation or follow-up. As a result, the resident went home without the ordered home care services, leading to worsening of his wounds and subsequent hospital admission. The facility's policy required a post-discharge plan developed by the interdisciplinary team, including arrangements for follow-up care and support, but this process was not followed. Interviews with staff revealed gaps in training and understanding of discharge procedures, and the resident was not adequately prepared or oriented for a safe transition home.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙