Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Provide Consistent Range of Motion Program

Bloomington, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

Fine: $18,150
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with limited lower extremity range of motion (ROM) did not consistently receive the prescribed ROM program as outlined in her care plan and treatment administration record (TAR). The resident, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, and recurrent bilateral hip subluxations, was supposed to receive assisted lower extremity ROM exercises twice daily. However, documentation over a seven-month period showed that the resident either refused or did not receive ROM for the majority of scheduled opportunities, with some months showing no ROM provided at all. The care plan specified that staff should assist with daily supine ROM and strengthening exercises, and instructions were available both on the resident's bulletin board and in her possession. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that ROM was often not performed, with some staff stating they only moved the resident's legs during other care activities, such as wound care or repositioning. Staff also indicated that the resident frequently refused ROM, but there was no evidence of timely reassessment or communication with the provider regarding these refusals. The director of nursing confirmed the lack of reassessment and acknowledged that the care plan and provider updates were overdue. Facility policy required that restorative nursing programs be individualized and documented in the care plan, with regular assessment by an RN, but these steps were not consistently followed for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙