Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Document Mental Illness in MDS Assessments

Montevideo, Minnesota Survey Completed on 08-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two sampled residents. For one resident, documentation showed diagnoses of altered mental status, social phobia, depression, hallucinations, and psychotic disorder with delusions. This resident's Level I PASRR indicated a referral for a Level II assessment for mental illness, which was completed and confirmed the presence of mental illness. However, the resident's admission MDS and subsequent MDS assessments did not document the mental illness in Section A, despite the PASRR findings. Interviews with the social worker revealed that the omission occurred because the resident was not eligible for additional services, but the social worker acknowledged that the MDS should have been coded to reflect the mental illness diagnosis. The DON also agreed that the MDS should accurately reflect the resident's condition. Review of the facility's policy showed requirements for timely completion of assessments but did not specify procedures to ensure accuracy, staff training, or oversight for MDS completion.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙