Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Ensure Consistent Documentation of Resident's Resuscitation Wishes

Woodbury, Minnesota Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's wishes regarding resuscitation were accurately and consistently documented across all areas of the medical record. For one resident with moderately impaired cognition and multiple diagnoses, including Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and COPD, there were discrepancies in the documentation of code status. The resident's face sheet and physician's orders indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), while the Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form indicated both Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and DNR. Interviews with the resident confirmed her wish not to receive life-saving measures. Multiple nursing staff and the director of nursing reported that the POLST is the primary document referenced for code status in the event a resident is found unresponsive. Staff acknowledged that if the POLST contained conflicting instructions, such as both CPR and DNR, they would seek clarification from a nurse manager or compare the POLST to the face sheet in the electronic medical record. Facility policy stated that the physician order status and POLST should be followed in resuscitation situations. The presence of conflicting documentation in the resident's records created confusion among staff regarding the appropriate action to take, and the error was not corrected at the time of the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙