Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Abuse Allegation and Protect Resident During Investigation

West Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse involving a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of behavioral issues, including accusations against staff. The resident, who had restless leg syndrome, a history of falls, and impaired safety awareness, made allegations that a staff nurse physically abused him during an incident where he rolled out of bed. Despite the resident's history of making unsubstantiated claims, the facility's policy required a comprehensive investigation, including interviews with all relevant staff and residents, and removal of the alleged perpetrator from resident contact until the investigation was complete. The investigation was incomplete as staff and residents on the unit where the alleged abuse occurred were not interviewed. Only a few nurses and residents from a different unit were questioned, and key staff who had provided care to the resident were not included in the inquiry. The social worker and director of nursing acknowledged that interviews with staff and residents from the transitional care unit (TCU), where the incident allegedly took place, were not conducted. Additionally, the facility's own policy, which mandates thorough documentation and interviews with all potential witnesses and involved parties, was not followed. Furthermore, the staff member accused of abuse was allowed to return to work with resident contact before the investigation was completed, contrary to facility policy. The alleged perpetrator was suspended for only one shift and then returned to duty prior to the conclusion of the investigation. This action failed to ensure the protection of the resident and other vulnerable individuals during the investigation process, as required by both facility policy and regulatory standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙