Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Monitor and Document Edema Management

Rochester, Minnesota Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively monitor and assess a resident with a history of heart failure and lymphedema for edema, which prevented the determination of intervention effectiveness and the development of new interventions as needed. The resident's care plan required staff to monitor for adverse reactions to diuretics, apply and assess edema wraps and compression devices, and document skin assessments. However, weekly skin checks over a two-month period consistently indicated no edema, and the medical record lacked further assessment of the resident's left upper extremity edema during this time. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident continued to experience significant swelling in the left upper extremity, with visible puffiness and limited hand movement. Nursing staff acknowledged the chronic nature of the resident's edema but were unable to identify where this was documented in the records. One nurse noted that the edema had persisted at its current level for almost a month without documentation, and another stated that documentation of the edema was expected but not present. The facility's policy required assessments to be documented in the electronic health record, but this was not done for the resident's ongoing edema.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙