Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Lights Within Reach for Residents with Cognitive and Mobility Impairments

Roseville, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach for two residents who required extensive assistance and had cognitive impairments. One resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and anxiety was observed on two separate occasions lying in bed with the call light on the floor, tangled and pushed against the wall, making it inaccessible. Staff interviews confirmed that the call light was not within reach and that it should have been accessible to the resident at all times, as directed by the care plan. Another resident with moderate cognitive impairment, a history of falls, and significant mobility limitations was repeatedly found without access to their call light, both in bed and in a wheelchair. Family members reported multiple instances where the call light was out of reach or under the bed, and documentation confirmed these occurrences. Staff interviews acknowledged the expectation that call lights should be within arm's reach of residents, and facility policy required call lights to be accessible to all residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙