Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0801
F

Failure to Employ Qualified Food and Nutrition Services Staff

Roseville, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to employ a full-time registered dietician (RD) or a qualified culinary director (CD) to oversee the food and nutrition services, which had the potential to affect all 135 residents. Documentation showed that while the dietician held a valid license, her timecards did not specify the exact hours or days spent at the facility, and she split her time between multiple buildings. The administrator stated that 30 hours per week was considered full-time for the dietician, but the records did not clearly confirm her presence at the facility for those hours. Additionally, the dietician herself confirmed she was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and that her hours varied week to week. The culinary director (CD) and assistant culinary director (ACD) also lacked the required qualifications. The CD had a certificate from Le Cordon Bleu but was not a CDM, had not completed coursework in food management, and did not have an associate's degree or higher. The CD was reportedly being enrolled in a CDM program at the time of the survey. The ACD had a bachelor's degree in culinary arts and was a Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM), but proof of credentials and certifications was not available in the personnel file. The ACD had only recently started working at the facility and had not yet provided documentation of his qualifications. Interviews with staff and administrators revealed confusion and inconsistencies regarding the credentials and roles of the dietician, CD, and ACD. The facility was unable to provide complete personnel files or clear documentation of staff qualifications and hours worked. Job descriptions for the CD and ACD outlined requirements for education and experience, but the individuals in these roles did not meet all the stated qualifications, and supporting documentation was incomplete or missing.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙