Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Assess and Document Use of Wheelchair Brakes as Restraints

Roseville, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents were free from the use of physical restraints, specifically the use of locked wheelchair brakes, without proper assessment or physician orders. Both residents had significant cognitive impairments, including dementia, and required varying levels of assistance with mobility and transfers. Despite this, their care plans and medical records did not indicate any assessment to determine if they could independently unlock their wheelchair brakes, nor were there orders for the use of locked brakes as a restraint. During observations, both residents were found in the common area with their wheelchair brakes locked, restricting their ability to move. One resident attempted to stand and propel the wheelchair but was unable to do so due to the locked brakes, resulting in repeated unsuccessful attempts to move or stand. The other resident, who was dependent on others to lock or unlock the brakes but could self-propel, was also unable to move the wheelchair or reach for support due to the brakes being locked. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about whether these residents could unlock their brakes and whether the use of locked brakes was part of their care plan. Further interviews with nursing staff and the DON confirmed that wheelchair brakes should not be locked unless the resident can unlock them, as this would otherwise constitute a restraint. The facility's own policy required a comprehensive assessment, education on risks and benefits, and a physician's order for the use of physical restraints, none of which were documented for these residents. The lack of assessment and documentation led to the inappropriate restriction of movement for both residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙