Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Meal Preferences for Fried Eggs

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's meal preference for fried eggs with runny yolks, despite the availability of pasteurized eggs, which are permitted under federal regulations for such preparations. The resident, who had intact cognition and no delusional thinking, repeatedly requested fried eggs but was consistently denied this choice by management. Observations confirmed that the resident was served hard-boiled eggs instead, while other residents were seen consuming eggs with runny yolks in the dining room. The dietary manager's progress note documented informing the resident that only fully cooked eggs would be served, but did not provide a rationale for this restriction, even though pasteurized eggs were available in the facility. Interviews with staff, including a cook and the assistant director of nursing, revealed confusion and lack of consensus regarding the policy for serving fried eggs. The cook confirmed that pasteurized eggs were available and believed it was acceptable to serve fried eggs using them, but stated that the facility owner did not allow it, without providing a clear reason. The assistant director of nursing acknowledged that the interdisciplinary team had discussed the issue but had not reached a decision, and recognized the importance of resident choice in meal options. The resident's nutritional care plan did not address the restriction on fried eggs, nor did it provide any clinical justification for denying the resident's preference. The facility was unable to produce a policy on meal choices when requested. The lack of documentation, clear rationale, and consistent practice regarding resident meal preferences led to the deficiency in accommodating resident choice and promoting quality of life.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙