Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Reassess and Update Interventions After Pressure Ulcer Development

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively reassess a resident after the development of an in-house acquired pressure ulcer, resulting in a lack of additional or modified interventions to promote healing and prevent complications. The resident, who had significant cognitive impairment, hallucinations, and care rejection behaviors, was identified as being at risk for pressure ulcers but had no ulcers at the time of the last formal assessment. Despite the development of a sacral pressure ulcer, documentation showed that the care plan and interventions remained largely unchanged, with staff continuing previous repositioning routines and applying various topical treatments without a documented comprehensive review. Observations and interviews revealed that staff were unsure of any new or additional interventions beyond the use of an air mattress and topical creams. There was inconsistency in wound care products used, and staff could not articulate a clear plan for wound management or prevention of further injury. The resident's nutritional status was not reassessed or addressed, despite wound care notes recommending optimization of nutrition. The medical record lacked evidence of interdisciplinary team involvement or a comprehensive evaluation of the resident's risk factors and needs after the ulcer developed. Interviews with nursing and hospice staff confirmed that no comprehensive reassessment or interdisciplinary review was conducted following the onset of the pressure ulcer. The assistant director of nursing acknowledged that such reviews were not routinely performed for pressure ulcer development and that documentation of interventions and risk reassessment was lacking. The facility's own policy required reassessment upon changes in condition, but this was not followed in the case of the resident who developed the pressure ulcer.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙