Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Timely Podiatry Services

Canton, Michigan Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely podiatry services for one resident with significant medical needs, including dementia, polyneuropathy, and chronic pain syndrome. Observations revealed that the resident's toenails were raised, long, thickened, discolored, and fungal-like, with dry and scaly skin around the toes. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident's toenails were in need of trimming and that there were ongoing issues with insurance coverage for in-house podiatry services. Documentation of attempts to secure podiatry services or to communicate with the resident's guardian about these issues was not available. Additionally, there was no evidence that concerns regarding podiatry coverage were discussed during care conferences. The clinical record showed that the resident had previously received podiatry care, with a note indicating elongated, dystrophic, and discolored nails, and a recommendation for reassessment in nine weeks or as needed. However, there was a lack of follow-up and no documentation of further podiatry visits or efforts to address the resident's ongoing foot care needs. Facility policy required referrals to ancillary providers with resident consent and follow-up as needed, but this process was not documented or followed for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙