Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During High-Contact Care

Ashley, Michigan Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

15 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including autism, anxiety, and a gastrostomy requiring tube feedings. The resident's care plan and physician's orders indicated the need for EBP, and facility policy required gown and gloves to be available and used during high-contact care activities, such as incontinence care, for residents on EBP. During an observation, two certified nursing assistants provided incontinence care to the resident without wearing gowns, despite signage on the door indicating EBP was required. Interviews with the staff involved revealed a lack of awareness and understanding regarding the application of EBP. One CNA was not aware that the resident required EBP and believed that EBP was only necessary for care related to the tube feeding, not incontinence care. A registered nurse also stated that EBP was not required for CNAs since they did not handle the tube feeding. However, facility signage and policy defined high-contact care activities, such as incontinence care and transfers, as requiring gown and gloves for residents on EBP.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙