Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Maintain Effective Grievance Resolution Process

Orchard Lake, Michigan Survey Completed on 07-02-2025

Penalty

Fine: $61,4258 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective grievance resolution process, as evidenced by the lack of prompt and documented responses to resident concerns. One resident, who was cognitively intact, reported multiple instances of missing personal items, including clothing, a purse, a wallet, a significant amount of money, and a blanket. The resident stated that she had reported these issues to both a staff member and the Administrator, but did not receive any follow-up or information regarding what actions, if any, were taken to address her concerns. The Administrator confirmed that unless a formal grievance form was completed, concerns were not documented or formally investigated, and no records existed of any investigation or follow-up for this resident's reported missing items. Additionally, during a group interview with eight residents who attended resident council meetings, seven expressed ongoing dissatisfaction with the facility's handling of laundry, specifically regarding the return of their clothing. Residents reported that labeled clothing often did not return from laundry, and issues persisted for a long time without resolution or explanation from the facility. Residents also indicated a lack of clarity and confidence in the grievance process, with some stating that expressing concerns did not lead to resolution and that there was confusion about how to file grievances. A review of the facility's grievance policy revealed that all grievances, whether expressed orally or in writing, should be tracked, investigated, and resolved, with the resident kept informed of progress. The policy also required the Grievance Officer to maintain a log of all grievances. However, the facility's practice, as described by the Administrator, was to only document and investigate concerns if a formal grievance was filed, resulting in a lack of documentation, tracking, and resolution for concerns that were not formally submitted. This practice did not align with the facility's written policy and led to unresolved resident grievances.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙