Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
E

Failure to Assess Blood Pressure Parameters Before Administering Antihypertensive Medication

St. Louis, Michigan Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease was administered Metoprolol without proper assessment of physician-ordered parameters. The physician's order specified that the medication should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or pulse was less than 60. However, review of the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) showed that the resident received Metoprolol multiple times without blood pressure monitoring prior to administration. On one occasion, the resident's blood pressure was documented as 97/61, which was below the ordered threshold, yet the medication was still administered. The Director of Nursing confirmed that blood pressure readings were not consistently documented before medication administration, as required by both physician orders and facility policy. The facility's policy mandates that vital signs be obtained and recorded as necessary prior to medication administration, but this was not followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙