Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Monitor and Manage Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic Residents

Yale, Michigan Survey Completed on 07-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to adequately assess, monitor, and control blood glucose levels for two residents with diabetes. For one resident, blood sugar monitoring and sliding scale insulin coverage were discontinued based on pharmacy recommendations, and although blood glucose levels remained consistently elevated, no further adjustments to insulin dosages were made after a certain date. Documentation showed that the majority of blood glucose readings were above the normal range, and communications regarding high blood sugar levels did not result in changes to the treatment plan. The resident reported that their blood sugars were out of control but had not discussed this with staff, and the nurse practitioner was unaware of the ongoing elevated levels. For another resident, there was a lack of ongoing blood sugar monitoring despite a history of worsening diabetes and hospital discharge instructions to continue both sliding scale and long-acting insulin with tight glycemic control. After an initial period of frequent blood sugar checks, documentation of blood glucose monitoring ceased, and there were no active orders for blood sugar checks or sliding scale insulin. The resident's care plan included monitoring glucose levels, but this intervention was not consistently implemented. Staff interviews confirmed that blood sugar checks were not being performed, and the facility did not have a policy for insulin sliding scale or diabetes/insulin orders.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙