Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Document and Communicate Pharmacy Medication Review Recommendation

Grand Haven, Michigan Survey Completed on 08-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a pharmacist's medication regimen review recommendation was properly documented and communicated for one resident. The resident in question was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including dementia, bipolar disorder, and depression, and was assessed as being severely cognitively impaired. On a specific date, the pharmacist indicated that a comment or recommendation had been made regarding the resident's medication regimen, as noted in the progress note. However, a review of the resident's electronic medical record did not reveal any documentation of what the pharmacist's recommendation or comment was, nor any evidence that the physician had reviewed or acted upon it. Interviews with the DON confirmed that the expected documentation, which should have been scanned into the resident's EMR, could not be located. Further attempts to obtain the report from an outside company providing physician services were unsuccessful, as they also did not have a copy of the relevant pharmacy report. The facility's policy requires that any irregularities identified by the pharmacist be reported to the attending physician, medical director, and DON, and that the physician document their review and any actions taken in the resident's medical record. In this case, there was no documentation to confirm that these steps were followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙