Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
E

Failure to Investigate and Report Alleged Abuse

Dimondale, Michigan Survey Completed on 07-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $54,280
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to appropriately identify, investigate, and report multiple allegations of abuse involving nine out of ten residents. In each case, residents or their representatives submitted concern forms or made statements describing staff behavior that included verbal abuse, neglect, rough or rude care, and, in one instance, an allegation of sex trafficking. Despite these reports, the facility did not recognize these as abuse allegations, did not initiate investigations, and did not report the incidents to the state agency as required. The facility's responses were limited to providing staff education or discussing the incidents with the involved parties, without further protective measures or formal documentation of investigations. Several residents, including those with cognitive impairments and those who were cognitively intact, reported specific incidents such as being left without oxygen, being forced to sit in soiled briefs, being spoken to rudely or with an attitude by nursing staff, and having call lights hidden or being left unable to call for help. In some cases, residents' family members corroborated the allegations, describing repeated patterns of staff misconduct and lack of timely response to resident needs. The facility's administration consistently categorized these concerns as customer service issues rather than abuse, even when residents explicitly stated they felt abused or when the nature of the complaint met the regulatory definition of abuse or neglect. Interviews with facility leadership, including the Administrator, DON, and Unit Manager, revealed a lack of recognition of abuse allegations and a failure to follow required protocols for investigation and reporting. Staff involved in the alleged incidents were not removed from resident care duties during the review of the concerns, and there was no evidence of five-day investigation reports being submitted to the state agency. Documentation of interviews and follow-up actions was either absent or insufficient, and in some cases, staff could not recall the incidents or the education they purportedly received. The facility did not ensure the safety of residents or comply with regulatory requirements for abuse prevention and reporting.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙