Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Follow and Revise ADL Care Plans for Bathing and Hygiene

Flushing, Michigan Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow and/or revise care plans for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) related to bathing and personal hygiene for three residents. Observations and interviews revealed that residents experienced missed showers and unkept appearances, including body odor, without documented refusals or individualized care plans reflecting their preferences. For example, one resident was observed to have body odor on multiple occasions and reported that showers were not given regularly. The care plan indicated staff assistance for sponge baths twice weekly and as needed, but did not specify individualized days or whether a sponge bath was the resident's preferred method of bathing. Shower records showed only four showers in a 30-day period, and there was no documentation of refusals in the progress notes. Another resident reported inconsistent assistance with bathing and hygiene, stating that some staff were helpful while others were not, and that there were staffing shortages on certain shifts. The care plan called for staff assistance with showers twice weekly and as needed, but again lacked individualized scheduling or documentation of resident preferences. Shower records indicated missed showers on specific days, with no documented refusals. A third resident expressed dissatisfaction with receiving only quick bed washes instead of showers, which he did not like. The care plan included staff assistance for showers and instructions to reapproach and document refusals, but only two showers were recorded in a 30-day period, and no refusals were documented in the progress notes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙