Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Advance Directive for Code Status

Cadillac, Michigan Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's advance directive regarding code status. The resident had a Power of Attorney (POA) document specifying that she wanted life-support treatment to the greatest extent possible for at least 30 days, after which her preference would change to not wanting life-support if certain conditions existed. This document was signed by the resident while she was competent. Additionally, a code status form signed by the resident indicated her wish to receive CPR in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest. Later, when the resident was determined to be unable to make healthcare decisions, the POA was activated, and the resident's daughter, acting as POA, signed a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order for the resident, which contradicted the resident's previously expressed wishes in her advance directive and code status form. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the conflicting information between the resident's advance directive and the DNR order signed by the POA. There was no documentation of any discussion with the POA regarding the resident's express wishes prior to the change in code status. When interviewed, the resident appeared confused but verbally expressed a desire for CPR. The facility's policy required honoring residents' wishes as expressed in valid advance directives, but this was not followed in this case, resulting in the resident's end-of-life care decisions not being honored.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙