Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Ensure Physician Response to Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review Recommendations

Traverse City, Michigan Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

Fine: $119,41525 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) conducted by the pharmacist were addressed by the attending physician and properly documented in the clinical records for two residents. For one resident, the pharmacist made multiple requests for clarification of a diclofenac order and recommended a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for quetiapine, but there was no documentation of physician response or rationale for declining these recommendations in the electronic medical record (EMR). The orders remained unamended, and the physician's section of the MRR forms was left blank. For another resident, the pharmacist recommended obtaining a lipid panel and A1c due to daily use of rosuvastatin and quetiapine, but there was no evidence in the EMR or laboratory results that these tests were performed, nor was there documentation of the physician's reasoning for not following the recommendation. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not have a system in place to ensure physician responses to pharmacist recommendations were documented, and the facility's policy required providers to review and address all pharmacist recommendations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙