Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0909
F

Failure to Routinely Inspect Resident Beds for Entrapment Risk

South Hadley, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that all resident bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails were routinely inspected for safety and entrapment risk on all three units. Interviews with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) and the Administrator revealed that there was no current policy or systematic process in place to guarantee annual inspections of resident beds. Although the DOM stated that beds should be inspected yearly using an entrapment risk tool, documentation in the Bed Assessment book showed that only a portion of beds were inspected over the past year, with no evidence that all beds received annual assessments as required. Record review indicated that out of 132 beds, only 25 were inspected in December, 59 between April and November, and 4 in late November, leaving a significant number of beds without documented annual inspection. Both the DOM and the Administrator confirmed the absence of a formal policy and a reliable system to ensure timely and routine bed inspections. No information was provided regarding specific residents affected or their medical conditions at the time of the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙