Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Arrange Audiology Services for Resident with Hearing Loss

Fall River, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 07-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to arrange for an audiology appointment for a resident with a documented history of hearing loss. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of hearing loss, and repeated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments over the course of a year documented moderate to highly impaired hearing, with no hearing aid or other hearing appliance in use. The resident's care plan identified communication problems related to hearing impairment, and interventions included discussing communication difficulties and administering ear drops for wax build-up. Despite a physician's order to consult audiology as needed and ongoing complaints from the resident about hearing difficulties, there was no evidence that an audiology referral was made. Interviews with staff and the resident's health care proxy revealed that the resident's hearing had worsened over the past year and that the issue was discussed in a care plan meeting. However, care plan meeting notes did not document the request for audiology services, and the medical records staff confirmed that no referral for audiology had been made, despite the audiologist visiting the facility quarterly. The resident was not included on the list for the most recent audiology visit, and staff turnover contributed to a lack of follow-through on the referral process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙