Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
J

Failure to Revise Dysphagia Care Plan After Repeated Choking Incidents

Framingham, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

Fine: $325,875
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to review and revise a resident's dysphagia care plan in response to repeated choking episodes and recommendations from a Speech Language Pathologist (SLP). The resident, who had a history of dysphagia, dementia, and right-side hemiplegia following a stroke, experienced multiple choking incidents that required staff to perform the Heimlich Maneuver. Despite these events and the SLP's recommendation for direct supervision during meals, the care plan was not updated to include this intervention, and the resident continued to be supervised only from a distance. The resident's care plan was initially updated after a choking episode to downgrade the diet and provide education on safe eating practices. However, after subsequent choking incidents, including those where the resident expelled large pieces of unchewed food, the only intervention added was re-education on taking small bites and alternating with sips. The SLP evaluation specifically recommended direct supervision with oral intake, but this was not incorporated into the care plan, nor was it implemented in practice. Staff interviews confirmed that no one was assigned to provide direct supervision during meals, and documentation of education or further SLP referrals was lacking. The failure to revise the care plan and implement direct supervision as recommended by the SLP persisted despite ongoing choking episodes. Ultimately, the resident choked during a meal, was found unresponsive, and died despite staff intervention. The facility's own investigation and staff interviews confirmed that the SLP's recommendations were not added to the care plan, and no new interventions were implemented following repeated incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙