Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter Care

Auburn, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice for two residents who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to the presence of indwelling urinary catheters. For one resident with Alzheimer's Disease and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, a nurse did not perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and entering the resident's room, and only wore gloves—omitting the required gown—while performing a hands-on assessment of the urinary catheter. The nurse later acknowledged not following the EBP signage, and the unit manager confirmed that a gown was required for any hands-on catheter care. For another resident with incomplete paraplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, a unit manager performed hand hygiene, donned gloves only, and entered the resident's room to assess the indwelling urinary catheter. The unit manager did not wear a gown as required by the EBP signage for catheter care. Upon review, the unit manager acknowledged that a gown should have been worn during the procedure to prevent potential contamination. Both incidents were observed by surveyors and confirmed through interviews and review of facility policy and CDC guidelines. The facility's own policy and posted signage indicated that both gloves and gowns were required for high-contact care activities involving indwelling medical devices, such as urinary catheters, under EBP. The failure to follow these protocols was directly observed and acknowledged by the staff involved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙